Soluzioni dietetiche vantaggiose per tutti alla crisi climatica

Scritto il
Pubblicato inclimate crisis , dietary , dr greger , dr gregor , dr michael greger , eat lancet , environmental impact of meat , food carbon footprint , health , how not to die , how not to diet , meat and climate change , michael greger , nutrition , nutrition facts , nutritionfacts.org , planetary health diet , solutions , sustainable food , the

L'impronta di carbonio del cibo sulla crisi climatica: la Commissione EAT-Lancet definisce la dieta migliore per la salute umana e planetaria.

I nuovi iscritti alla nostra e-newsletter ricevono sempre un omaggio. Prendi il tuo qui: https://nutritionfacts.org/subscribe/

Quindi, quali alimenti hanno la più bassa impronta di carbonio? (http://nutritionfacts.org/video/which-foods-have-the-lowest-carbon-footprint). Scoprilo dopo. Quindi resta sintonizzato per quali diete hanno l'impronta di carbonio più bassa? (http://nutritionfacts.org/video/which-diets-have-the-lowest-carbon-footprint).

Penso che l'unico video sul riscaldamento globale che ho fino ad oggi sia stato Dieta e cambiamento climatico: preparare una tempesta (https ://nutritionfacts.org/video/diet-and-climate-change-cooking-up-a-storm/). Sono entusiasta di pubblicare l'ultima.

Un modo per ridurre l'impatto climatico della carne è passare a carne di origine vegetale o coltivata. Ho fatto un webinar su di esso e puoi ottenere il download digitale qui (https://drgreger.org/collections/videos/products/plant-based-and-cultivated -carne-digitale).

Hai una domanda su questo video? Lascialo nella sezione dei commenti su http://nutritionfacts.org/video/win-win-dietary-solutions-to-the-climate-crisis e qualcuno del team di NutritionFacts.org cercherà di rispondere.

Vuoi ottenere un elenco di collegamenti a tutte le fonti scientifiche utilizzate in questo video? Fare clic su Fonti citate su https://nutritionfacts.org/video/win-win-dietary-solutions-to-the-climate-crisis. Troverai anche una trascrizione e riconoscimenti per il video, il mio blog e il programma del tour di conferenze e un modo semplice per cercare (anche per lingua tradotta) attraverso i nostri video che coprono più di 2, 000 argomenti di salute.

Se preferisci guardare questi video su YouTube, iscriviti al mio canale YouTube qui:

98 Risposte a “Soluzioni dietetiche vantaggiose per tutti alla crisi climatica”

  8. The so-called "climate crisis" is demonstrably fake. I have copies of Time and Newsweek from the 1970's proclaiming "the coming ice age" and foretelling the global famine that was to come (because of evil capitalism of course). They said "the science is settled" to stifle debate. That didn't turn out so well for the anti-capitalists, so they next conjured up "global warming". Fast forward a few years, and that too fell apart under the weight of its own lies. So the latest scam iteration is non-descript "climate change", which literally means nothing and therefore impossible to disprove. Congrats, anti-capitalists, now you have Dr. Greger on your your side too! We get it – you hate capitalism. https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-of-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions/

  9. Followed Dr G for almost 10 years now but he is becoming more and more like a cartoon character with his movement. Its so distracting watching him act like he's in a car going over speedbumps

  11. Having been an ovolacto vegetarian for about five decades my dietary contributions to methane production has been minimal. I fully endorse a plant based diet and very much appreciate NutritionFacts.org's exposure of nutrition fraud. That said, an easy-to-read 116 page book titled Human Caused Global Warming by Tim Ball, PhD would be a good book for you to read. Dr. Ball's PhD is in Historical Climatology.

  12. Great to see the WHO is more concerned with people's jobs than people's health. I figured these people just cared about their own jobs, still remarkable…

  15. There are 11,000 scientists who worship Jesus. There are 11,000 scientists who are Muslim. WGAF about the opinion of 11,000 scientists? That's not how scientific credibility is determined. I don't get my climate science from NutritionFacts.org just as I wouldn't get dietary advice from a climate scientist.

  20. Wealth over health will be humanity's downfall. The cry to save the planet is really self serving. As long as there is life on this planet it will reinvent itself, with or without us.

  30. Come on doc! Don't you have any good news about my bad habits? Why can't I save the planet and improve my health on a diet of meat lover's pizza and mountain dew?

  37. ALSO IMPORTANT to switch to REGENERATIVE FARMING practices to support soil microbes which absorb carbon from the atmosphere, enrich the soil with nutrients we want to put into crops/food. And let's stop putting glyphosate on crops because it kills the microbes in our soil and accumulates in us when we eat GMO crops, and grains desiccated and harvested with glyphosate.

  38. Individuals, politicians and corporations all need to do more to protect the planet from climate change.
    We must stop adding more fossil fuels to the climate fire. Do your part. Go Vegan.

  39. Another great video! We are both in our 80's and may be the oldest-newest YouTubers ever! We recently created our healthy-aging advice YT channel to inspire & help people of any age. We believe in maintaining a strong body, a calm mind, & a positive outlook. Always learn a lot here. TY.

  40. Financial institutions, banks, pension funds, universities and insurance companies need to divest from fossil fuels.
    They are a bad investment for people and the planet. Coastal properties will lose value as banks and insurance companies see rising sea level as a threat to their bottom line.

  41. As a visual antithesis of the freaky organic eco-hippie nut, maybe the powers that be will listen to you! Dr. Greger for Surgeon General!

  43. If you account for personal health, pandemic risk, economic benefit, ethics, land use, biodiversity, and climate change, then a plant based diet is more like a win-win-win-win-win-win-win.

  50. I just thought of a new dimension for people like us to consider. The brilliance of something like a Green New Deal is that it’s also a jobs program, so we don’t just say “too bad” to the workers (not the capitalists & owners) in the fossil fuel industry when their jobs are retired. On a policy front we should start considering the effect on and the message we send out to the people who are churning the machinery that are making us fat and boiling the planet. They are regular and probably well meaning people also

  51. I want to dare to give my family this link. But most wont look at it and the ones that do will feel attacked again and we will have fights again. Cognitive dissonance and a lack of critical thinking is costing me my friends and family. I sometimes wish I was still the gullable meateater I was ten years ago, at least there was likemindedness when I was closeminded.

  52. All good and well, now take into account that most of the worlds population is now living off of some form of social security, then taking into account that most of those totals live in third world countries (myself included) which depending on exchange rate, only receive between 90 to 160 USD per month (roughly 80 to 145 GPB per month).
    Now you walk into your closest convenience-store, supermarket or mall and search for your monthly supply of affordable produce with that minuscule budget in mind, animal based products and GMO products are the cheapest followed by a select few fresh fruits and vegetables (depending on your region) that you can count on one hand, then comes your middle-class to upper-class animal based -, GMO – and prepacked fruit&veg products and then finally the healthier plant based alternatives are priced at a premium that's way outside of your minuscule budget.
    Now tell me, is there a conspiracy afoot to wipe out the lower and middle class shopper or more likely, are humans as a species just stupid?

  56. Sadly I think the Lancet Commission made an error in – the 21st-century great food transformation – because their total *red meat intake ranges from 0-28 g/day and not their total daily meat intake. I think they just misscited themselves. Beef + lamb 0-14 g/d, pork 0-14 g/d, poultry 0-58 g/d, fish 0-100/g = 186 g/d (total maximum daily meat intake) and they argue for dairy because oh no calcium so 250 g/d (possible range = 0-500 g/d) and why not have some eggs 13 g/d (0-25 g/d). I guess these ranges aren't the worst but dairy and a sustainable food system is not making sense to me. I also find it odd that they almost dismiss potatoes as healthy atleast they need to update that ( https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2018.1557102)

  64. I'm a huge fan Dr Greger, but disappointed with this video. What does all plant life on this planet require (hint: photosynthesis)… 1) sunlight, 2) water, 3) CO2. CO2 is quite literally plant food. As a doctor you know humans require it too. In terms of CO2 levels for sustaining life we are far closer to having too little CO2 than too much. Earth is at a historically low level of CO2. Plants stop growing when CO2 levels fall to about 150 PPM (parts per million), and earth's atmosphere is currently at ~400 PPM. If we were to reduce CO2 levels by ~60% earth would be approaching a point where plant life would be difficult to sustain. This is not a controversial statement. The ideal amount of CO2 for plants is more than twice present levels. Plants are more drought resistant at higher levels of CO2. Rice, corn, wheat and other course grain yields have increased dramatically over the last 60 years due to the little bit of extra CO2. India is now an exporter of wheat since it cannot eat all of what it produces. NASA refers to this as the CO2 fertilization of the earth. Humans are used to living in significantly higher levels of CO2 as well. We do it all the time, in our homes, offices, schools, cars, trains and planes.. more than twice the level of ambient CO2, because humans breath. More than ten years ago over 30,000 scientists signed a petition from the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine outlining their issues with the current state of climate "science" and it included many notable scholars. I read the paper you cited, where's the data? They throw up some graphs and make general directional statements… that is not science. What I love about your content is you go to great length to cite "legitimate" research.

  65. You are going against corporations that make money on everyone being sick. They will make sure the masses believe that climate change is a lie and cause as much confusion about health as possible.

  66. Even more important than plants for human flourishing, is access to energy. Human longevity has increased dramatically over the last 100 years, in direct proportion to access to energy. Sadly, about a 3rd of earth's population still does not have access to a regular form of energy. Those poor souls struggle for water, food and warmth, not to mention life's pleasures. Human mortality due to weather related events has fallen off a cliff over the last 100 years, also directly correlated to access to energy. We are far more safe from climate than any time in human history. If one wanted to quickly reduce human longevity, the easiest way to achieve that would be to reduce access to energy. It's a very easy thing to "put to the test" as we approach winter in the Northern Hemisphere. Just stop using any form of energy that comes from a fossil fuel, and any product produced, transported or kept fresh with a fossil fuel. After all, no one forces us to use energy, we do it greedily. We have year round access to all manner of fresh whole plant based food… its grown hundreds and sometimes thousands of miles away from where we live. Most of us would have no regular access to water without an abundant form of energy, and certainly little or no fresh whole plants. Most climate policy today is regressive, it makes energy more expensive. Energy drives the cost of everything, as in EveryThing. The wealthy might buy less organic whole plant food, and perhaps fly coach… but for those at the lower end of the economic pyramid, those policies are catastrophic. Who said this “Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket. . . . Because I’m capping greenhouse gases, coal power plants, natural gas—you name it—whatever the plants were, whatever the industry was, they would have to retrofit their operations. That will cost money. They will pass that money on to consumers.” President Obama.

  68. What is the ideal temperature of the planet? Shouldn't everyone, school children, know that answer after 40 years of global climate research? What is the appropriate amount of CO2 to achieve the ideal temperature? If we don't know what to set earth's thermostat to, it seems unscientific to suggest lowering or raising. Regardless of what the mechanism is to "control" (as if we could) earths chaotic non-linear climate, the most important question is what is the ideal global average temperature that promotes the most human flourishing. 80% of Canadians live within 100 km of the US border because life is harsh farther north. It's more difficult to grow whole plant food in colder climates with shorter growing seasons. For omnivores its more difficult to raise livestock. Few flock to colder climates, many flock to warmer climates. All life on the planet flourishes in warmer climates, and struggles in colder harsher climates.

  69. A central theme in Dr Greger's work is the search for strong correlations based on robust experiments between a plant and a health benefit. That is ultimately the unraveling of climate "science". The correlation between global average temperature and CO2 is transient at best, sometimes its an inverse relationship, and over the longer term CO2 seems to lag temp. From the mid 1940's to the mid 1970's (post war industrialization) CO2 was rising and the earth was cooling… a 30 year period of inverse correlation. This is noted (in small print) in the IPCC's own Assessment Reports. From 1979 to 1999 there was a strong correlation, and then from 2000 to 2014 a correlation of zero… this period became known as "the pause". If one looks back a bit farther, we find it was likely warmer about 1000 years ago when the Vikings settled onto Greenland (The Medieval Warm Period) when CO2 levels were significantly lower. 2000 years ago, The Roman Warm Period… CO2 levels significantly lower. 7000 years ago, the Holocene Optimum was most likely the warmest period of the last 100k years when maybe 5 million people were on the planet, no fossil fuels and significantly lower levels of CO2. Its widely accepted that the earth has been in and out of 4 glacial periods over the last 400K years where temps rise and fall as much as 18 degrees F… all during periods of fairly constant levels of CO2, and when CO2 does move it seems to follow rather than lead temp. Dramatic climate change well before anthropogenic GHG emissions. Geologists have long believed that for 90% of earth's 4.7 billion year history there was no ice on the planet. We have year round ice all over the planet… both poles, Greenland, Glacier National Park… Technically we are in an inter-glacial period, but within an ice age (year round ice). It's hard to imagine Dr Greger recommending a plant that had so little empirical data to support it, if it was only supported by "models" that merely predicted the benefits. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tAYXQPWdC0&ab_channel=JimAttrell

  74. Less CO2, less whole plants. More CO2, more whole plants. More whole plants, healthier humans 🙂 Plants need three things to grow (photosynthesis): sunlight, water and CO2. CO2 is quite literally plant food. All life is carbon based and humans need CO2 as well. From the perspective of supporting life, the earth is much closer to having too little CO2 than too much. Science has long known that plants begin to struggle for life when CO2 falls to about 150 PPM (parts per million). The current atmosphere has about 400 PPM. So if we were to reduce CO2 levels about 60% we would be approaching an atmosphere that would struggle to sustain life. On the other hand plants love CO2, the more the better. Most modern plants evolved during periods of more than twice the amount of CO2. Plants are more drought resistant in higher levels of CO2. Since the beginning of the industrial revolution we've added a little more than 1-100th of 1 percent of CO2 into the atmosphere, but that little bit of CO2 has dramatically improved the fertilization of the earth. NASA refers to it as CO2 fertilization. Over the last 60 years rice, wheat, corn and other course grain yields have skyrocketed. India is now a net exporter of wheat, it cannot eat all of what it grows. Humans also do well in higher levels of CO2… in our homes, cars, schools, offices, and doctor's offices. Each human emits about 800 pounds of CO2 into the atmosphere each year simply by breathing, and when we are gathered together its natural for the local amount of CO2 to rise 2 or 3 times the ambient levels in the atmosphere. CO2 is not a pollutant, it is quite literally essential for life.

  77. A VERY interesting video…..makes one wonder if those in power WANT to kill most of us to try to keep the population down in some manner…..I also thought that Dr. Greger forgot another important aspect of going Vegan versus Animal protein diet in that based on many of his vids, the world would be far less likely to experience these cross species viruses/flus/pandemics……as he simply focused on the climate and general health impacts and left out the impact of how raising these animals has a disease creating impact as well…..

  82. if you want to listen to climate experts who write text books for universities on the subject matter of space weather and the interactions with earth weather Check out Suspicious Observers on you tube or his websites.

  86. there is no climate crisis. its called spring, summer, autumn, winter. if al gore wasnt trying to become a billionaire 20 years ago, then we wouldnt have people repeating this nonsense as though it were science. al gore got his billions, so lets move on from this fable

  88. Legume plants are natural fertilizers as well. So it's fantastic to use them as rotation crops so we can use less chemical fertilizers, which actually shrivels up the ground a bit more after every use. (You need more and more of it.)
    Legumes are an amazing base ingredient for mock meats as well. It's a super win-win situation and I bothers me we don't do anything with this information.

  90. I'm vegan, and I also have integrity. But you, apparently, are willing to sacrifice the truth on your alter of veganism, or you're easily fooled by msm.

    Regarding your diagrammatic evidence, did western industrial civilisation really begin at 1980?
    Either way, I've had enough of following you.

  98. we're at ~400ppm, crops can't grow much if at all around 150ppm. Greenhouses use well over 1000ppm to ensure optimal crop growth.
    This carbon zero narrative is a net negative for plant growth. To get to optimal range of CO2 globally, we need to triple the amount of CO2, not reduce it.

I commenti sono chiusi.

Tema Seamless Buone Ricette, sviluppato da Altervista

Apri un sito e guadagna con Altervista - Disclaimer - Segnala abuso - Privacy Policy - Personalizza tracciamento pubblicitario