Bias della ricerca finanziata dall'industria alimentare
Utilizzando il playbook dell'industria del tabacco, le aziende alimentari sono state sorprese a cercare di minare le politiche di salute pubblica manipolando il processo scientifico.
I nuovi iscritti alla nostra e-newsletter ricevono sempre un omaggio. Prendi il tuo qui:
https://nutritionfacts.org/subscribe/
Questo fa parte di una serie di video “politici” che ho messo insieme. Collaborazione con i Nuovi Vettori di Malattie (http://nutritionfacts.org/video/collaboration-with-the-new-vectors-of-disease/) era il precedente con un sacco di altri in arrivo. Perché non mi limito a “attenermi alla scienza”? Quando ci sono miliardi di dollari in gioco, il corpo delle prove può essere distorto e manipolato. I finanziatori possono determinare quali studi vengono eseguiti, come vengono eseguiti e se vengono pubblicati o meno. Ecco perché penso che sia importante avere una visione più ampia per tenere conto dei modi in cui il metodo scientifico può essere alterato a scopo di lucro. <
Ecco alcuni esempi:
• The McGovern Report (http:// Nutritionfacts.org/video/the-mcgovern-report/)
• Uova e colesterolo: affermazioni palesemente false e fuorvianti (http://nutritionfacts.org/video/eggs-and-cholesterol-patently-false-and-misleading-claims/)
• Seeing Red No. 3 Coloring to Dye For ( http://nutritionfacts.org/video/seeing-red-no-3-coloring-to-dye-for /)
• BOLD Effettivamente: la carne di manzo abbassa il colesterolo? (http://nutritionfacts.org/video/bold-indeed-beef-lowers-cholesterol/)
• Chi determina se gli additivi alimentari sono sicuri? (http://nutritionfacts.org/video/who-determines-if-food-additives-are-safe/)
• Chi dice che le uova non sono sane o sicure? (http://nutritionfacts.org/video/who-says-eggs-arent-healthy-or-safe/)
Hai una domanda per il Dr. Greger su questo video? Lascialo nella sezione commenti su http://nutritionfacts.org/video/food-industry-funded-research-bias/ e proverà a rispondere!
Credito immagine: Centers for Disease Control, Beao e Lnmrl Beao tramite Wikimedia Commons e Steve Snodgrass tramite Flickr.
https://NutritionFacts.org
• Iscriviti: https://nutritionfacts.org/subscribe
• Dona: https://nutritionfacts.org/donate
• Podcast : https://nutritionfacts.org/audio
• Facebook: www.facebook.com/NutritionFacts.org
• Twitter: www.twitter.com/nutrition_facts
• Instagram: www.instagram.com/nutrition_facts_org
• Libri: https:/ /nutritionfacts.org/books
• Negozio: 71https://drgreger.org
Exactly!
Love the videos, keep up the great work!
We need to be reminded that "concentrated" juices are rehydrated with city "tap" water – not to mention the added poison of fluoride in the water. And what else do restaurants cook there food in – much less "Kraft" processed foods?
Maybe you can do a video on if there is sufficient data to prove marijuana works medicinally better than some drugs? On cancer and that sort of thing?
Economic interest is behind everything nowadays, propaganda and misleading claims everywhere.
It's amazing to me that this kind of flagrant misdirection can be legal. WRITE your Representitve.
Could you please do a video on vitamin B17 and cancer growth? See if it is quackery or not.
Fantastic work!
This should be on the news on all tv's for all to see. The people doing those things like Phillip Morris need psychological help.. and a jail sentence!
Thank you so much for your great work. Please watch your back.
Cheers
Jim
Thanks for another great video, and the wonderful insight into mosquito marketing 😉
this is why peer review is so important when seeing a study
great video!if people would only see it's a cycle of bs.
It's a sick world in which we live. Does the world need its own form of killer T-Cells? Maybe that's what we're missing. Maybe humanity, or Earth's biosphere, will evolve such a thing.
Dr Greger should recieve the Nobel prize for medicine. Dear Dr. Greger, thank you for your selfless work for the benefit of so many people. Please keep up the good work !
I hear that one of those Doctors shows was saying that a bowl of icecream was healthier than and equal size bowl of bananas, because it had less carbs.:(
"In a survey of around 11,000 Americans, the organization found that 84 percent of vegetarians and vegans return to eating meat. Most lapse within a year, while nearly a third don't last more than three months."
I prefer the nutrition-focused videos, BUT this one is spot-on brilliant! Every now and then we need a reminder WHO is pushing disastrous health policy. The fact these industries see this as just a game to make money is sickening. "Public health" should not be a punchline for big business.
Greed, greed, greed! ("For the LOVE of money is the root of all evil…" I Timothy 6:10a)
The meat industry hired the same PR firm paid to downplay the risks of tobacco and candy.
Watch below or click the link to watch on NutritionFacts.org: http://nutritionfacts.org/video/food-industry-funded-research-bias
Wow that"s ridiculous! I'm glad I'm on the right track now!
WOW 12,000 people watched this. My faith in humanity – restored.
Dr. Michael Gregor, you're my hero.
PLEASE CALL THIS…….
"SMOKE AND CANDY"……..??
Thank you Dr. Greger! You are doing a fantastic service to your YouTube viewers. I cannot believe that our news media isn't doing anything to uncover this dirty secrets of those corporations. Our civilized world is full of traps, luring us into buying things, and they make us to eat the foods that can harm us. We must be aware of all these hidden dirty, ugly, secrets, because our government can't care less about our true health and wellbeing.
I see the same methods used to deny climate change. Same methods by the same people.
Would vegan foods like Gardein's "fishless filet" be considered highly processed?
http://gardein.com/products/golden-fishless-filet/
it's a terrible shame this video has so little views
1:45
And yet the vegans purport to have us quit eating meat based on weak epidemiological evidence. The evidence for smoking was far from weak, even if it was epidemiological. But, you know hypocrisy is a thing.