DHA a base di alghe contro lino

43 Risposte a “DHA a base di alghe contro lino”

1. @mvandervert9 Excellent question! All the algae-oil omega-3 supplements currently on the market are made from phytoplankton that are in an entirely different biological kingdom than the blue-green algae known to produce toxins (such as spirulina, detailed on nutritionfacts. org when you search 'blue green algae'.

2. The video cuts in the middle!

3. What do you think? raw-food-health. net/can-i-get-enough-dha-without-meat

4. Andrew doesn't allow comments on his website and has been caught dealing out a lot of misinformation. Unfortunately, he has too many articles to debunk, so it's best to avoid the site completely.

5. You're a LFRV / vegan hater then? Peace

6. Nope, I'm a 14+ year vegan who did 80/10/10 for almost a year before I had to stop because it was harming my health. After doing real research, I found out that the people promoting 100% raw food aren't using science to back up their claims and merely want the title "raw foodists"… there's no reason at all to be 100% raw and it offers zero benefits over a healthy, whole-food, plant-based diet with cooked food.

7. Okay, fair enough. What do you think is lacking in raw foods that is available in cooked foods though? I'm personally all for a healthy cooked food 80/10/10 diet too, by the way, depending on personal preference. Doctors including Dr.Greger, Dr.McDougall, Dr.Esselstyn and Dr.Neal Barnard promote high carb, low fat (80/10/10) too, along with sports nutritionists, cancer specialists, heart disease specialists and diabetes specialists. Peace 🙂

8. If you follow Dr. Gregers video's, you'll see a few regarding raw food and how they aren't absorbed as well as cooked – absorption is EVERYTHING when it comes to nutrition. That, along with the fact that more than half the population can't eat a lot of fructose or can't absorb a lot of fructose at one time, means that a raw foodists has to consume way more calories than they should – which leads to other problems. There's no just good reason to force 100% raw… cont…

9. But nutrient absorption is just a small part of it… the people who promote raw foodism use pseudoscience or anecdotes to back up their claims. 100% raw food diets are also far too expensive, require far too much transportation, not adequate for all life stages (a regular vegan diet is) and is impractical for most people. Again, there's simply no real benefit to go 100% raw. Most raw foodists do it only for the title and go through unnecessary restrictions (i.e. some exclude garlic)…

10. There are many types of raw food diet, and increased lycopene jntake through cooking isn't necessary. It isn't a fact that more than half the population can't eat a lot of fructose or absorb a lot of fructose at one time, but problems can occur with poor food combining, a high fat inake, non-sensible bedtimes, stress, low B12 / D, seen in people on all food intakes. etc.

11. It's way more than lycopene… but the point is, there's no reason to deal with those shortcomings on 100% raw… just adding a little cooked food makes a huge difference. There's absolutely nothing wrong with steamed kale (you absorb way more nutrients), steamed sweet potato (far more nutritious than bananas), steamed broccoli (breaks down the tough cellulose), etc… "food combining" is raw food pseudoscience, the stomach can process mixed meals.

12. It is suitable for all life stages. Excellent results, including overcoming mild and severe health issues, maintaining a slim physique, overcoming addictions, increased athletic performance / energy, increased feel-good etc are there to be seen. It may be expensive or impractical at times though, I agree with you. It sounds like you felt a lot of frustration on following it anyway. Peace

13. "It is suitable for all life stages." According to who??

    All those things you listed are anecdotal – there is no science behind any of those claims at all. "overcoming addictions"? Really, only 100% raw food can do this?

    And I loved it – at first – then my health rapidly declined. Having met a lot of others doing 80/10/10, David Wolfes diet, Dr. Cousens diet, etc. I knew of many people who suffered terribly with 100% raw. All problems which were dismissed or downplayed by others…

14. Cool on cooked veggies;sure 🙂
    Digestive issues can occur when eating fruit after cooked foods, because fruit digests more quickly than cooked food. Nuts and tougher to digest veggies can cause issues like bloating when eaten alongside fruits. Acid fruits and non-acid fruits eaten together can cause problems also. When fat is eaten alongside sugar, blood sugar levels rise. Dr. Neal Barnard shares the science on this (non-raw), therefore, fats need to be eaten separately to fruit/kept til supper.

15. Individually, foods break down at different rates, but if you understand how the stomach processes foods, then there's no reason to "food combine"…. it's pseudoscience. And Barnard doesn't recommend it, he says if it makes you feel better, go ahead (placebo…).

16. David Wolfe's diet and Cousens aren't based on science, unlike 80/10/10. There will always be people trying different food-styles. Commitment is necessary; people will always try for a short time and say it didn't work for them. However, there are many, many people whom it is working for and whom are thriving. Just a small fraction are shown on my channel and I need to update / add more. Many of these people have lost lots of weight and overcome addictions to junk food. This can happen with cook

17. Sorry, but 80/10/10 is not based on science. Doug has some pretty crazy ideas and none of them are backed by evidence (i.e. getting B12 from the AIR!) or women who lose their menstrual cycle is "normal"…

    "However, there are many, many people whom it is working for and whom are thriving." Unfortunately, it's a very small percentage of those who have tried and even they haven't done it long term. And many "raw foodists" actually do cheat on their diet – even Freelea is eating cooked food.

18. This can happen on healthy cooked food diets also, although it may be more difficult. For myself, my 'sweet tooth' is satisfied when I eat 80% of my caloric intake from sweet fruit, so that I was able to give up eating chocolate which I felt heavily addicted to, along with crisps / chips etc.
    It must have felt very frustrating to have encountered problems with it yourself. Peace

19. This is an interesting pro-vegan article, although many of us will have compromised absorption due to previous standard diet, or else we don't have access to freshly picked food. In his video at foodnsport, Doug Graham recommending doing your own experiment and taking a B12 sup to see if you feel better. I'm sure you know that people on all food intakes have issues with B12.
    libaware. economads. com/b12issue.
    debbietookrawforlife. blogspot. co.uk/2009/04/periods-they-may-be-normal-but-are-they

20. Again, Doug is wrong. His recommendation is to wait and see if you need to supplement, when we know 100% that you shouldn't wait because damage caused by B12 deficiency can be non-reversible. He says that because supplementing would destroy his "natural hygiene" philosophy.

    And the article about menstruation – anecdotal and very flawed. I'm not going to point out all the errors, I simply don't have time.

21. You mean to say that Spirulina has a Neurotoxins effect?

22. Check

23. Can you get too much DHA?

24. Did this video get cut off? After doing some research regarding the consequences of unbalanced ratios of omega 3 to 6, I'm going to start including omega 3 in my diet. Flax, chia or algae….? Which is best ? :o.

25. Can you have too much EPA DHA in your diet? Also whats the optimal ration of DHA to EPA?

26. Beware if you are allergic to mold, spirulina etc, my son's and my eye balls starting twitching after taking dha from algae, when we stopped, the twitching went away, when we started again, it started.  My wife and his wife do not have the twitching eyeball issue from taking it.

27. My mom ate shit and now I'm dyslexic with terrible eyesight. Is it too late to improve?

28. 59 second video??

29. I think this video got cut off.

30. This video is truncated. What happened to the rest of it?…. It just cuts out.

    I have one question:

    Is taking a smaller amount of algal oil better than taking none at all? I can't afford my normal capsules anymore, but I can spread them out. If anyone knows…

31. Hemp seeds are even better they contain chemicals that allow much better conversion of EPA/DHA along with GLA which is not found in flax or chia or other superseeds.

32. Has anyone actually assayed any of these products to verify the DHA content?

33. What about duckweed since we are on the topic of aquatic plants? I don't fance harvesting algae as I may end up growing a strain that has a neurotoxin in it.

34. The quality control is poor in these videos… starting to take the advice of this channel with a pinch of salt.

35. They all have coconut oil and other oils in them which we are supposed to stay away from??

36. are these informations about child development after mother supplemented dha during pregnancy not accurate anymore since you made a new video where you point out the meta analysis that dha supp during pregnancy doesnt have benefits for children relating brain development and vision?

37. My question is since I have family high cholesterol and am taking Flax seed oil is it safe to also take Algae-derived DHA as well?

38. The video ran out of EPA

39. "But still, flax is amazing stuff // "

40. I've got vegan dha supplement and also taking daily my organic chia seeds , B12 organic vegan safe they say best on market , only supplements I dont take take vitamin D , I might low in Vitamin K I dont eat greens that maybe responsive why my acne spots and scars ain't fading even in my nearly 30s

41. Did Dr. Greger really read the study??? The study is about breast-fed children in comparison with "formula-diets"in 3 different groups (dha+ara, dha only, and none of those) all those groups perfomed worse in IQ tests than the breast-fed(111) group. And the dha+ara group (108) performed better than the dha-only group(106) (Control group was 101).
    "Our finding that the DHA group also had poorer Verbal IQ than the breast-fed group suggests that a dietary supply of both DHA and ARA are important for the developing brain"
    I guess Dr. Greger did not mention this because ARA is almost only available from animal source?
    link to the study: http://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/43806033/visual-acuity-and-cognitive-outcomes-at-4-years-of-age-in-a-double-

42. Volume needs a bump. Too quiet. Can't hear it…

43. Terrible video. Didn't say anything, and just ended without a conclusion.

I commenti sono chiusi.